<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[Good news for Oregon: a clearer picture of where mariculture can thrive]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>A new spatial suitability assessment from <strong>The Nature Conservancy</strong> and <strong>Geo Horizons </strong>finds that "the future of mariculture will be bright along the Oregon coast..."<br /><br />The assessment covers <strong>nearly 900,000 acres</strong> of Oregon's coastal ocean and estuarine waters, from Astoria to Brookings, and evaluates suitability for a range of local species–including <strong>Olympia oysters, blue mussels, purple sea urchin and abalone, giant kelp, bull kelp, </strong>and<strong> dulse</strong>–across multiple cultivation methods (tank culture, longline, sub-tidal, and on-bottom). It weighs both biophysical and social factors: available area, proximity to infrastructure, supply chain logistics, alignment with coastal planning goals, and compatibility with commercial fishing and recreational use.<br /><br /><strong>A few standout findings for kelp and co-culture:</strong></p><ul><li>Port Orford ranked high on the list kelp cultivation potential in the coastal ocean zone; </li><li>Bandon ranked highest for co-culture (kelp + shellfish), with Umpqua/Reedsport and Port Orford also ranking near the top in the coastal ocean zone;</li><li>Coos Bay, Umpqua River, and Tillamook Bay stand out among estuaries suitable for co-culture of seaweed and shellfish.  </li></ul><p>Read the <a href="https://www.conservationgateway.org/collections/oregon/spatial-assessment-of-mariculture-suitability-along-oregons-coast/" target="_blank">overview and full report</a>, and connect with the <a href="https://seagrant.oregonstate.edu/oregon-coastal-mariculture-collaborative" target="_blank">Oregon Coastal Mariculture Collaborative</a> to get involved. <br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /></p>]]></description><link>http://hub.greenwave.org/community/topic/1038/good-news-for-oregon-a-clearer-picture-of-where-mariculture-can-thrive</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Sun, 27 Sep 2026 01:22:24 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="http://hub.greenwave.org/community/topic/1038.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Wed, 26 Aug 2026 22:50:03 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Good news for Oregon: a clearer picture of where mariculture can thrive on Tue, 08 Sep 2026 10:18:55 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p><a class="plugin-mentions-user plugin-mentions-a" href="http://hub.greenwave.org/community/uid/12">@kendall_barbery</a> The link to the report appears to be dead. I tried a link here, too, with the same result: <a href="https://www.nature.org/en-us/newsroom/oregon-mariculture-assessment/" target="_blank">https://www.nature.org/en-us/newsroom/oregon-mariculture-assessment/</a><br />Do you have a local contact that can send me the report? Thanks!</p>]]></description><link>http://hub.greenwave.org/community/post/3159</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://hub.greenwave.org/community/post/3159</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[scott_lindell]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 08 Sep 2026 10:18:55 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>